Portal BASE · ID 13077874
Município de MurçaAQUISIÇÃO DE SERVIÇOS, EM REGIME DE AVENÇA, NA ÁREA DO DESPORTO
These are contract records, not verified payments or an estimate of money received by each supplier.
28 days between the recorded signing and publication dates.
Dates are displayed in recorded chronological order. A gap alone does not establish a breach of law.Signing is recorded on 2026-01-05 and publication on 2026-02-02, an interval of 28 days. Recorded dates may need correction; this calculation does not establish a legal breach.
What explains the gap between the recorded signing and publication dates?
Check both dates against BASE and the signed contract. Ask when the record was submitted and whether it was corrected.
The record names no supplier, or one supplier has no tax identifier. This describes incomplete data, not the absence of an award recipient.
Which supplier and tax identifier appear in the original contract, and why are they missing from the record?
Open the contract and award documents. Ask the public body to identify the recipient and correct or explain the missing fields.
This observation does not establish favouritism, illegality or loss. Verify the documents and seek the public body’s explanation before publishing.
Values describe contracts, not losses or verified payments. Missing values are not treated as known spending.
Some older records combine contractual and final values. This limitation remains visible until reimport. These are not verified payments.
Not available
Supplier totals use published shares; where unavailable, equal allocation is an estimate.
Source evidence: Portal BASE · Not available
essential fields present: 3 (5)
Missing fields: contractual price, suppliers
An indicator describes a pattern in the data. It does not establish wrongdoing. No indicators does not certify a contract.
Publication is more than 10 calendar days after signing. This configured delay is not a legal deadline determination.
A recorded supplier has no NIF, or a positive reported final price has no recorded supplier. This describes source completeness.
Reported final price is below half the positive base price. A reduction is descriptive and requires source review.