Portal BASE · ID 11644872
União das Freguesias de Vila Cova da Lixa e Borba de GodimPavimentação da Rua Dr. António Manuel Cerqueira Magro em 5005 metros quadrados e pavimentação da Rua Bombeiros Voluntários da Lixa, Rua António Nobre, Rua Pe. Manuel Lopes Dias da Rocha e Travessa do Ciclo em 9090 metros quadrados
These are contract records, not verified payments or an estimate of money received by each supplier.
88 days between the recorded signing and publication dates.
Dates are displayed in recorded chronological order. A gap alone does not establish a breach of law.Signing is recorded on 2025-05-22 and publication on 2025-08-18, an interval of 88 days. Recorded dates may need correction; this calculation does not establish a legal breach.
What explains the gap between the recorded signing and publication dates?
Check both dates against BASE and the signed contract. Ask when the record was submitted and whether it was corrected.
This observation does not establish favouritism, illegality or loss. Verify the documents and seek the public body’s explanation before publishing.
Values describe contracts, not losses or verified payments. Missing values are not treated as known spending.
Some older records combine contractual and final values. This limitation remains visible until reimport. These are not verified payments.
Supplier totals use published shares; where unavailable, equal allocation is an estimate.
Source evidence: Portal BASE · Not available
essential fields present: 4 (5)
Missing fields: contractual price
An indicator describes a pattern in the data. It does not establish wrongdoing. No indicators does not certify a contract.
Publication is more than 10 calendar days after signing. This configured delay is not a legal deadline determination.
Base value lies within 5% below one of the configured comparison amounts. Proximity alone does not establish splitting or a legal violation.
A buyer's first-digit distribution departs from Benford's distribution using chi-square with at least 20 observations. Data selection can invalidate the diagnostic; it is not evidence of fraud.